A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially within a delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which is partially created, is in the proper place. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture which has because turn out to be emblematic of your depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Get visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got described their long-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair basically trying to make a family members household in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have already been completed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, will not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description for your problem that numerous observers see as more and more prevalent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very distinctive professional backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-superior drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior h2o during a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The courtroom Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times ought to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other long once the authorized costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it is going to eventually be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.